Razavi Journal of Medicine

Razavi Journal of Medicine

Investigating the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Response Inhibition and Cognitive Flexibility in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department Of Cognitive Neuroscience, University Of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Research Development Committee of Taleghani Hospital and Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by excessive, uncontrollable, and persistent worry about various life events. Evidence suggests that deficits in response inhibition and reduced cognitive flexibility contribute to the persistence of this disorder.

Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on response inhibition and cognitive flexibility in individuals with GAD

Method: This quasi-experimental study employed a pre-test–post-test design with a control group. The study population comprised FARAJA police officers referred to the neurology and psychiatry department of Imam Sajjad Hospital in Tehran over a nine-month period. Thirty participants were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups (n = 15 per group). Response inhibition was assessed using the Stroop Color–Word Test, and cognitive flexibility was assessed using the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory developed by Dennis and Vander Wal. The experimental group received 20 sessions of low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 110% of the motor threshold. Each session lasted 30 minutes, and sessions were conducted five times per week over one month.

Results: The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in response inhibition measures compared with the control group (p ≤ 0.001). Cognitive flexibility also increased significantly in the experimental group relative to the control group (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was associated with improvements in response inhibition and cognitive flexibility in individuals with GAD. These findings suggest that rTMS may represent a potential non-invasive intervention for improving specific cognitive functions in this population. However, as anxiety symptoms were not directly assessed as outcome measures in the present analysis, the extent to which these cognitive changes relate to clinical symptom improvement remains unclear.

Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), registration number IRCT20250129064556N1.
Keywords

Acknowledgements: This article was derived from a research project. The authors sincerely thank all participants and everyone who assisted in conducting this research.


Data Availability: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


Ethical Considerations: This study received ethical approval from the university under the code IR.TABRIZU.REC.1403.024 and registered in the Iranian Clinical Trial Registry (IRCT: 20250129064556N1). All participants provided written informed consent after the study objectives and procedures were fully explained. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were by the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964.


Consent for publication: Not applicable


Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the present study.


Funding: The present study received no financial support.


Author Contributions: The first author contributed to idea development and data collection. The second and third authors contributed to idea development, supervision of the research process, and data collection. The third and fourth authors contributed to data analysis. All authors contributed to the initial drafting of the manuscript and accept responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of its contents.

Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

1. World Health Organization. Anxiety disorders (Internet). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 Sep 8 (cited 2026 Aug 18). Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders.
 
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR. 5th ed, text rev. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787  
 
3. Kenwood MM, Kalin NH, Barbas H. The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):260-275. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z
PMid:34400783
 
 
4. Makovac E, Meeten F, Watson DR, Garfinkel SN, Critchley HD, Ottaviani C. Alterations in amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity account for excessive worry and autonomic dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(10):786-795. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.013
PMid:26682467
 
 
5. Roy AK, Fudge JL, Kelly C, Perry JSA, Daniele T, Carlisi C, Pine DS. Intrinsic functional connectivity of amygdala-based networks in adolescent generalized anxiety disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(3):290-299.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.010
PMid:23452685 PMCid:PMC3760686
 
 
6. Hilbert K, Lueken U, Beesdo-Baum K. Neural structures, functioning and connectivity in generalized anxiety disorder and interaction with neuroendocrine systems: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2014;158:114-126. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.022
PMid:24655775
 
 
7. Diekhof EK, Geier K, Falkai P, Gruber O. Fear is only as deep as the mind allows: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on the regulation of negative affect. Neuroimage. 2011;58(1):275-285. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.073.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.073
PMid:21669291
 
 
8. Maslowsky J, Mogg K, Bradley BP, McClure-Tone EB, Monk CS, Pine DS, Ernst M. A preliminary investigation of neural correlates of treatment in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2010;20(2):105-111. doi:10.1089/cap.2009.0049.
https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2009.0049
PMid:20415605 PMCid:PMC2865364
 
 
9. Hooper CJ, Luciana M, Conklin HM, Yarger RS. Adolescents' performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: Implications for the development of decision making and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Dev Psychol. 2004;40(6):1148-1158. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1148.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1148
PMid:15535763
 
 
10. Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP, Neubert FX, Jbabdi S, O'Reilly JX, Johansen-Berg H. The organization of dorsal frontal cortex in humans and macaques. J Neurosci. 2013;33(30):12255-12274. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5108-12.2013.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5108-12.2013
PMid:23884933 PMCid:PMC3744647
 
 
11. O'Reilly RC. The what and how of prefrontal cortical organization. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(8):355-361. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.05.002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2010.05.002
PMid:20573407 PMCid:PMC2916029
 
 
12. Fitzgerald KD, Liu Y, Stern ER, Lainhart JE, Monk CS. Reduced error-related activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex across pediatric anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(11):1183-1191.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.002
PMid:24157392 PMCid:PMC3910489
 
 
13. Nejati V, Khalaji S, Goodarzi H, Nitsche MA. The role of ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in attention and interpretation biases in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): A tDCS study. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;144:269-277. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.034.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.10.034
PMid:34710663
 
 
14. Kaplan JT, Gimbel SI, Harris S. Neural correlates of maintaining one's political beliefs in the face of counterevidence. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39589. doi:10.1038/srep39589.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39589
PMid:28008965 PMCid:PMC5180221
 
 
15. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49-100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
PMid:10945922
 
 
16. Leber AB, Turk-Browne NB, Chun MM. Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(36):13592-13597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805423105.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805423105
PMid:18757744 PMCid:PMC2527350
 
 
17. Zachariou V, Pappas C, Bauer CE, Bhat H, Toga AW, Zhang J. Regional differences in the link between water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier and cognitive performance in normal aging. Geroscience. 2024;46(1):265-282. doi:10.1007/s11357-023-00930-2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-023-00930-2
PMid:37713089 PMCid:PMC10828276
 
 
18. Rikhye RV, Gilra A, Halassa MM. Thalamic regulation of switching between cortical representations enables cognitive flexibility. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(12):1753-1763. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0269-z.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0269-z
PMid:30455456
 
 
19. Lee JK, Orsillo SM. Investigating cognitive flexibility as a potential mechanism of mindfulness in generalized anxiety disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014;45(1):208-216. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.006.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.006
PMid:24211849
 
 
20. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
PMid:23020641
 
 
21. Repantis D, Bovy L, Ohla K, Kühn S, Dresler M. Cognitive enhancement effects of stimulants: A randomized controlled trial testing methylphenidate, modafinil, and caffeine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021;238(2):441-451. doi:10.1007/s00213-020-05691-w.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05691-w
PMid:33201262 PMCid:PMC7826302
 
 
22. Buckley J, Cohen JD, Kramer AF, McAuley E, Mullen SP. Cognitive control in the self-regulation of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:747. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00747.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00747
PMid:25324754
 
 
23. Rosa-Alcázar AI, Rosa-Alcázar Á, Martínez-Esparza IC, Storch EA, Olivares-Olivares PJ. Response inhibition, cognitive flexibility and working memory in obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3642. doi:10.3390/ijerph18073642.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073642
PMid:33807425 PMCid:PMC8036460
 
 
24. Fujii Y, Kitagawa N, Shimizu Y, Oya K, Kikuchi M. Severity of generalized social anxiety disorder correlates with low executive functioning. Neurosci Lett. 2013;543:42-46. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.02.059
PMid:23562516
 
 
25. George MS, Nahas Z, Kozel FA, et al. Mechanisms and state of the art of transcranial magnetic stimulation. J ECT. 2002;18(4):170-181. doi:10.1097/00124509-200212000-00002.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00124509-200212000-00002
PMid:12468991
 
 
26. Carleton RN, Afifi TO, Taillieu T, Turner S, Mason JE, Groll D. Assessing the relative impact of diverse stressors among public safety personnel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1234. doi:10.3390/ijerph17041234.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041234
PMid:32075062 PMCid:PMC7068554
 
 
27. Cui H, Jiang L, Wei Y, Wang Y, Chen J. Efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for generalised anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis. Gen Psychiatry. 2019;32(5):e100051. doi:10.1136/gpsych-2019-100051.
https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100051
PMid:31673675 PMCid:PMC6802976
 
 
28. Griffiths C, da Silva KM, Leathlean C, Jiang H, Ang CS, Searle R. Investigation of physical activity, sleep, and mental health recovery in treatment resistant depression (TRD) patients receiving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. J Affect Disord Rep. 2022;8:100337. doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100337
PMid:35619990 PMCid:PMC9025392
 
 
29. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
PMid:16717171
 
 
30. Naeinian M, Shaeiri M, Sharif M, Hadian M. To study reliability and validity for a brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7). Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2011;9(1):41-50.  
 
31. Kapoula Z, Lê TT, Bonnet A, Bourtoire P, Demule E, Fauvel C, et al. Poor Stroop performances in 15-year-old dyslexic teenagers. Exp Brain Res. 2010;203(2):419-425. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2247-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2247-x
PMid:20437170
 
 
32. Dennis JP, Vander Wal JS. The cognitive flexibility inventory: Instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cogn Ther Res. 2010;34(3):241-253. doi:10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
PMCid:PMC4206174
 
 
33. Vatankhah H, Koochak Entezar R, Ghanbari Panah A. Prediction of emotional divorce based on cognitive flexibility and meaning of life with the mediating role of work-life balance. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal. 2021;10(9):32-47.  
 
34. Burguete-Castillejos LF, Domínguez-Pacheco FA, Martínez-González CL. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of anxiety disorders: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art. Rev Mex Neurocienc. 2022;23(1):22-28. doi:10.24875/RMN.20000130.
https://doi.org/10.24875/RMN.20000130  
 
35. Heydarpour S, Mehdizadeh Fanid L, Mirza Asgari Z, Heysieattalab S. Effects of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive functions of policemen with post-traumatic stress disorder. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2023;29(1):32-47. doi:10.32598/ijpcp.29.1.4493.1.
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijpcp.29.1.4493.1  
 
36. Rodrigues PA, Zaninotto AL, Ventresca HM, Rodrigues RC, Fregni F. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on anxiety in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Front Neurol. 2020;11:564940. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.564940.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.564940
PMid:33343483 PMCid:PMC7746857
 
 
37. Hauer L, Sellner J, Brigo F, Trinka E, Leitinger M. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over prefrontal cortex on attention in psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(4):416. doi:10.3390/jcm8040416.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040416
PMid:30934685 PMCid:PMC6518000
 
 
38. Hirsch CR, Mathews A. A cognitive model of pathological worry. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(10):636-646. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007
PMid:22863541
 
 
39. Kohandani M, Abolmaali Alhosseini K. Factor structure and psychometric properties of Persian version of Cognitive Flexibility Inventory of Dennis, Vander Wal, and Jillon. Psychological Models and Methods. 2017;8(29):53-70. doi:10.1001.1.22285516.1396.8.29.3.2.  
 
40. Cohen JD, Dunbar K, McClelland JL. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(3):332-361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
PMid:2200075
 
 
41. Joormann J, Gotlib IH. Updating the contents of working memory in depression: Interference from irrelevant negative material. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008;117(1):182-192. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.41.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.182
PMid:18266496
 
 
 

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 October 2026