Razavi Journal of Medicine

Razavi Journal of Medicine

PED-SegNet: Modality-Aware Hybrid UNetR for Pediatric Brain-Tumor Segmentation on BraTS-PEDs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, VelTech MultiTech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 Department of CSE, CVR College of Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
3 Department of CSD & CSM, Siddhartha Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
4 Department of CSE, Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
5 Department of IT, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
6 Department of CSE-CS, Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric brain-tumor segmentation from multi-parametric MRI is challenging because of heterogeneous tumor characteristics, small or absent enhancing regions, and variations across imaging systems. Accurate delineation of the enhancing tumor (ET) region remains particularly difficult.

Objectives: This study aims to develop PED-SegNet, a modality-aware deep learning framework for improving pediatric brain-tumor segmentation, boundary delineation, calibration, and robustness.

Methods: PED-SegNet combines a transformer-based encoder with a UNet-style decoder to capture global context and fine spatial details. Squeeze-excitation gates and cross-modal attention enable adaptive fusion of MRI modalities. Class-balanced Dice loss, Focal Cross-Entropy, region-aware supervision for WT/TC/ET, and an ET absence-tolerant target were incorporated. The model was evaluated on the BraTS-PEDs 2023 dataset using subject-level five-fold cross-validation with Dice, HD95, and ECE metrics, along with ablation and robustness analyses.

Results: PED-SegNet achieved mean Dice scores of 0.908 (WT), 0.876 (TC), and 0.721 (ET), with HD95 values of 4.2, 5.5, and 7.8 mm, respectively. ECE values were 0.031, 0.039, and 0.057. Compared with the baseline, Dice improved by 0.035, 0.041, and 0.078 for WT, TC, and ET, respectively, with a 1.2 mm reduction in HD95. The model required approximately 49.9 M parameters, 141 G MACs, 26 s per subject, and 7.2 GB VRAM.

Conclusions: PED-SegNet effectively combines transformer-based contextual learning, adaptive multi-modal fusion, and region-aware optimization for pediatric brain-tumor segmentation. The results demonstrate improved segmentation and boundary accuracy with practical computational requirements, indicating potential for deployment-oriented neuroimaging applications.
Keywords

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate: This study was conducted in accordance with applicable ethical standards. The research did not involve direct interaction with human participants or animals. Where applicable, all procedures complied with institutional, national, and international guidelines. Therefore, formal ethical approval and informed consent were not required.
Consent for Publication: Not applicable.


Data Availability: The study used the publicly available BraTS-PEDs 2023 dataset. The dataset was accessed through the public repository/mirror and used in accordance with the applicable data-use and attribution terms of the dataset source (8, 16]. No personally identifiable information was accessed or reported in this study.


Conflict of Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial interests that could have influenced the work reported in this paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

 

Funding: This research received no external funding.


Authors' Contributions: All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. Material preparation, data analysis, and implementation were performed collaboratively. The authors prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors reviewed, revised, and approved the final version.

Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

1. Hamd ZY, Osman EG, Alorainy AI, Alqahtani AF, Alshammari NR, Bajamal O, et al. The role of machine learning in detecting primary brain tumors in Saudi pediatric patients through MRI images. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2024;17(3):100956. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2024.100956.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.100956
 2. Pacchiano F, Tortora M, Doneda C, Izzo G, Arrigoni F, Ugga L, et al. Radiomics and artificial intelligence applications in pediatric brain tumors. World J Pediatr. 2024;20(8):747-763. doi:10.1007/s12519-024-00823-0.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-024-00823-0
PMid:38935233 PMCid:PMC11402857
3.  Gokula Krishnan V, Sankar Ram N. Analyze traffic forecast for decentralized multi agent system using I-ACO routing algorithm. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2019;10(8):3139-3148. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0981-2.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0981-2
4. Mishra SK, Praveen S. Paediatric brain tumor detection in MRI: A machine learning perspective. In: Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Its Application. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2024. p.593-598.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003606635-104
5. Kim MJ, Hong E, Yum MS, Lee YJ, Kim J, Ko TS. Deep learning-based, fully automated, pediatric brain segmentation. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4344. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54663-z.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54663-z
PMid:38383725 PMCid:PMC10881508
6. ezerra TMS, de Deus MS, Cavalaro F, Ribeiro D, Seidinger AL, Cardinalli IA, et al. Deep learning outperforms classical machine learning methods in pediatric brain tumor classification through mass spectra. Intelligence-Based Medicine. 2024;10:100178. doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2024.100178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2024.100178
7. Kharaji M, Abbasi H, Orouskhani Y, Shomalzadeh M, Kazemi F, Orouskhani M. Brain tumor segmentation with advanced nnU-Net: Pediatrics and adults tumors. Neurosci Inform. 2024;4(2):100156. doi:10.1016/j.neuri.2024.100156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2024.100156
8. Kazerooni AF, Khalili N, Liu X, Haldar D, Jiang Z, Anwar SM, et al. The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Focus on Pediatrics (CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs). arXiv [Preprint]. 2024. arXiv:2305.17033.
9. Vossough A, Khalili N, Familiar AM, Gandhi D, Viswanathan K, Tu W, et al. Training and comparison of nnU-Net and DeepMedic methods for autosegmentation of pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024;45(8):1081-1089. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8293.
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8293
PMid:38724204 PMCid:PMC11383404
10. Fathi Kazerooni A, Khalili N, Liu X, Haldar D, Jiang Z, Zapaishchykova A, et al. BraTS-PEDs: Results of the multi-consortium international pediatric brain tumor segmentation challenge 2023. Mach Learn Biomed Imaging. 2025;3:72-87. doi:10.59275/j.melba.2025-f6fg.
https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2025-f6fg
11. Sun X, He W, Ruan J, Yuan Z, Sun Z, Zhang J. An edge enhanced 3D Mamba U-Net for pediatric brain tumor segmentation with transfer learning. Med Phys. 2025;52(10):e70002. doi:10.1002/mp.70002.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70002
PMid:41046478
12. Cariola A, Sibilano E, Guerriero A, Bevilacqua V, Brunetti A. Deep learning strategies for semantic segmentation of pediatric brain tumors in multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep. 2025;15:22595. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07257-2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07257-2
PMid:40596219 PMCid:PMC12218216
13. Yi Y, Zhuang Q, Xu ZQJ. Frequency-Aware Ensemble Learning for BraTS 2025 Pediatric Brain Tumor Segmentation. arXiv [Preprint]. 2025. arXiv:2509.19353.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16365-3_40
14. Griffiths-King D, Mulvany T, Rose H, Novak J. Ratio maps of T1w/T2w MRI signal intensity do not improve deep-learning segmentation of pediatric brain tumors. PLoS One. 2025;20(12):e0323398. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323398.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323398
PMid:41428695 PMCid:PMC12721524
15. Ketabi S, Wagner MW, Hawkins C, Tabori U, Ertl-Wagner BB, Khalvati F. Multimodal contrastive learning for enhanced explainability in pediatric brain tumor molecular diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2025;15:10943. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-94806-4.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94806-4
PMid:40159500 PMCid:PMC11955525
16. Mostafa M. BraTS-2023-PED-Dataset [dataset]. Kaggle; 2024 [cited 2026 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mahamostafa/brats-2023-ped-dataset.
17. Santosh DT, Anuradha N, Kolukuluri M, Gupta G, Pathak MK, Gokula Krishnan V, Raghuvanshi A. Development of IoT based intelligent irrigation system using particle swarm optimization and XGBoost techniques. Bull Electr Eng Inform. 2024;13(3):1927-1934. doi:10.11591/eei.v13i3.6332.
https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i3.6332

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 August 2026