Characteristic features and surgical outcome in bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fracture: A retrospective observational study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

10.30483/rijm.2021.254214.1061

Abstract

Background: Bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is a rare and serious ‎condition with poorly understood characteristics and management. ‎
Objectives: To evaluate the characteristic features and outcomes of AFF in a two-center cohort ‎study.‎
Methods: In a retrospective survey, medical profiles of 22 AFF patients, who have used ‎alendronate for > 12 months, were reviewed. The demographic characteristics such as age, ‎gender, and BMI, the clinical features including symptoms, symptom duration, radiologic ‎characteristics including fracture site, the severity of the fracture, and contralateral involvement, ‎surgical characteristics including the type of surgery union period and postoperative ‎complications such as fixation failure, and union problems were extracted from the patients’ ‎profiles.‎
Results: The study population included 4 males and 18 females with a mean age ‎of ‎70.6±11.9 ‎‏ ‏years. ‎‏The mechanism ‎of fracture was falling down‎ in 21 (95.5% ) patients. The ‎mean duration of ‎‏bisphosphonate consumption was ‎‏‎3.8±2 ‎‏‎ years. Prodromal symptoms (pain and ‎limping) were recorded in 12 (54.55%) ‎‏patients. ‎‏The fracture was in the femoral shaft in 15 ‎‎(68.2%) and in the subtrochanteric‎‏‎ in 7 (‎‏‏‎31.8%) patients. ‎‏The fixation device was ‎‏the ‎intramedullary nail in 18 (81.8%) and plate in 4 (18.2%) patients. ‎‏The mean union period was ‎‏‎8.3±2.8 ‎months. Union complications (delayed or ‎‏nonunion) occurred in 6 (27.3%) patients. ‎Fixation failed in 5 (22.7%) patients (3 nails and 2 ‎‏plate fixation).‎‏
Conclusions: AFF is associated with a prolonged union. ‎‏The intramedullary nail provides a more ‎secure fixation. Prodromal symptoms could be used for earlier detection of patients. ‎‏

Keywords

References

 1.Fleisch H, Reszka A, Rodan G, Rogers M.
Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. Principles of
bone biology. 2002:1361-XLIII.
2.Favus MJ. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. New
England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(21):2027-35.
3.Kennel KA, Drake MT. Adverse effects of
bisphosphonates: implications for osteoporosis
management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(7):632-8.
PubMed PMID: 19567717. eng.
4.Abrahamsen B. Bisphosphonate adverse effects,
lessons from large databases. Current opinion in
rheumatology. 2010;22(4):404-9.
5.Papapetrou PD. Bisphosphonate-associated adverse
events. Hormones. 2009;8(2):96-110.
6.Giusti A, Hamdy NA, Papapoulos SE. Atypical
fractures of the femur and bisphosphonate therapy: a
systematic review of case/case series studies. Bone.
2010;47(2):169-80.
7.Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, Funahashi TT,
Silverman SL, Eisemon EO, et al. Incidence of atypical
nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. Journal
of Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27(12):2544-50.
8.Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR, Abrahamsen B, Adler
RA, Brown TD, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and
diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the
American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.
2010;25(11):2267-94.
9.Saita Y, Ishijima M, Kaneko K. Atypical femoral
fractures and bisphosphonate use: current evidence and
clinical implications. Therapeutic advances in chronic
disease. 2015;6(4):185-93.
10.Giaconi JC, Watterson CT. Bisphosphonate-Related
Atypical Femur Fractures and Their Radiographic
Features. The Duration and Safety of Osteoporosis
Treatment: Springer; 2016. p. 107-24.
11.Pisoude K, Elahifar O, Sohrabi MB, Khajemozafari J.
Comparison of proximal femur locking compression
plate and intramedullary nailing in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. Journal of Research in Orthopedic
Science. 2019;6(2):0-.
12.Eisenstein N, Kasavkar G, Bhavsar D, Khan FS,
Paskins Z. Incidence and medical management of
bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures in a
major trauma centre: a retrospective observational study.
BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017;18(1):1-6.
13.Shin JS, Kim NC, Moon KH. Clinical features of
atypical femur fracture. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia.
2016;2(4):244-9.
14.Franceschetti P, Bondanelli M, Caruso G, Ambrosio
MR, Lorusso V, Zatelli MC, et al. Risk factors for
development of atypical femoral fractures in patients on
long-term oral bisphosphonate therapy. Bone. 2013
Oct;56(2):426-31. PubMed PMID: 23871850. Epub
2013/07/23. eng.
15.Rajput IM, Kumar J, Siddiqui AA, Jamil M, Soughat
M, Ahmed MW. Surgical Fixation of Atypical Femur
Fractures in Bisphosphonate-treated Patients. Cureus.
2019;11(5).
16.Sahemey R, Nikolaides A, Bhattacharya S, Simons A,
Makrides P. Bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral
fractures: A novel strategy to improve patient outcomes.
Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation.
2020;27(2):192-7.
17.Bhadada SK, Sridhar S, Muthukrishnan J, Mithal A,
Sharma DC, Bhansali A, et al. Predictors of atypical
femoral fractures during long term bisphosphonate
therapy: A case series & review of literature. The Indian
journal of medical research. 2014;140(1):46. 
Razavi International Journal of Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 4
October 2021
Pages 1-5

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics