Coronary No-reflow Phenomenon: A Review of Therapeutic Pharmacological Agents

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Cardiology Department, Razavi Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Coronary no-reflow phenomenon (CNRP) is one of the leading catastrophic consequences of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although several preventive strategies have been advised, yet CNRP is not entirely controlled with pharmacological agents after diag- nosis. This study is a review of therapeutic pharmacological agents used in various studies for post-PCI-CNRP. Several pharmacologi- cal agents have been introduced for reducing the burden of adverse outcome, before or during PCI. Although most of these agents have shown a remarkable effect on post-PCI CNRP incidence reduction, and it seems more powerful are still needed for a better validation of the results. It appears that intra lesion and distal intracoronary administrations would have a less systemic effect, and therefore may be safer than catheter injection. Moreover, adenosine, sodium nitroprusside, and calcium channel blockers are among the most routine- ly used methods. However, we believe that the best approach in treating or preventing no-reflow post-STMI might be combinational therapy. By the way, although there have been numerous studies on different agents capable of lessening the noreflow phenomenon, yet there is no exact guideline for choosing the most appropriate drug. A systematic review and meta-analysis on all available or practiced combinational pharmacotherapies to prevent PCI-related no-reflow are needed to suggest the most appropriate therapy.

Keywords


Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

1. Danesh Sani SH, Eshraghi A, Shahri B, Vejdanparast M. No-reflow phenomenon in patients with STelevation acute myocardial infarction, treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of predictive factors. Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Medicine. 2014; 2 (4):221-226
 
2. Assali AR, Sdringola S, Ghani M, Denkats AE, Yepes A, Hanna GP, Schroth G, Fujise K, Anderson HV, Smalling RW. Intracoronary adenosine administered during percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction and reduction in the incidence of "no reflow" phenomenon. Catheterization and Cardiovascular interventions. 2000; 51 (1):27-31
https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-726X(200009)51:1<27::AID-CCD7>3.0.CO;2-0
PMid:10973014
 
3. Bouleti C, Mewton N, Germain S. The no-reflow phenomenon: state of the art. Archives of cardiovascular diseases. 2015; 108 (12):661-674
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2015.09.006
PMid:26616729
 
4. Kloner RA. No-reflow phenomenon: maintaining vascular integrity. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2011; 16 (3-4):244-250.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248411405990
PMid:21821523
 
5. Rezkalla SH, Stankowski RV, Hanna J, Kloner RA. Management of no-reflow phenomenon in the catheterization laboratory. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017; 10 (3):215-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.059
PMid:28183461
 
6. Brosh D, Assali AR, Mager A, Porter A, Hasdai D, Teplitsky I, Rechavia E, Fuchs S, Battler A, Kornowski R. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. American Journal of Cardiology. 2007; 99 (4):442-445
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.054
PMid:17293180
 
7. Born GVR. Aggregation of blood platelets by adenosine diphosphate and its reversal. Nature. 1962; 194 (4832):927-929
https://doi.org/10.1038/194927b0
PMid:13871375
 
8. Dhalla N, Pierce G, Panagia V, Singal P, Beamish R. Calcium movements in relation to heart function. Springer, 1982.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908167
PMid:6284117
 
9. Post R, Merritt C, Kinsolving C, Albright C. Membrane adenosine triphosphatase as a participant in the active transport of sodium and potassium in the human erythrocyte. J biol chem. 1960; 235:1796-1802 10. Paller MS, Hoidal J, Ferris TF. Oxygen free radicals in ischemic acute renal failure in the rat. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1984; 74 (4):1156-1164
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI111524
PMid:6434591 PMCid:PMC425281
 
11. Barcin C, Denktas AE, Lennon RJ, Hammes L, Higano ST, Holmes DR, Garratt KN, Lerman A. Comparison of combination therapy of adenosine and nitroprusside with adenosine alone in the treatment of angiographic no‐ reflow phenomenon. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. 2004; 61 (4):484-491
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20010
PMid:15065143
 
12. Galiuto L. Optimal therapeutic strategies in the setting of post-infarct no reflow: the need for a pathogenetic classification. Heart. 2004 Feb; 90(2): 123-125.
https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.020800
PMid:14729769 PMCid:PMC1768057
 
13. Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Barbagelata NA, DiCarli MF, Leesar MA, Browne KF, Eisenberg PR, Bolli R, Casas AC, Molina-Viamonte V. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the Acute Myocardial Infarction STudy of ADenosine (AMISTAD) trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999; 34 (6):1711-1720
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00418-0
PMid:10577561
 
14. Ross AM, Gibbons RJ, Stone GW, Kloner RA, Alexander RW, Investigators A-I. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMISTAD-II). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005; 45 (11):1775-1780
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.061
PMid:15936605
 
15. Braunwald E. Mechanism of action of calcium-channel-blocking agents. New England Journal of Medicine. 1982; 307 (26):1618-1627
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198212233072605
PMid:6292718
 
16. Verdecchia P, Reboldi G, Angeli F, Gattobigio R, Bentivoglio M, Thijs L, Staessen JA, Porcellati C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention. Hypertension. 2005; 46 (2):386-392
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000174591.42889.a2
PMid:16009786
 
17. Reffelmann T, Hale SL, Li G, Kloner RA .Relationship between no reflow and infarct size as influenced by the duration of ischemia and reperfusion. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2002; 282 (2):H766-H772
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00767.2001
PMid:11788428
 
18. Abbo KM, Dooris M, Glazier S, O'Neill WW, Byrd D, Grines CL, Safian RD. Features and outcome of no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention. The American journal of cardiology.1995; 75 (12):778-782
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80410-X
PMid:7717278
 
19. Su Q, Li L, Liu Y. Short‐ term effect of verapamil on coronary no‐ reflow associated with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐ analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical cardiology. 2013; 36 (8)
https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22143
 
20. Zhao J-L, Yang Y-J, Cui C-J, You S-J, Wu Y-J, Gao R-L. Different effects of adenosine and calcium channel blockade on myocardial no-reflow after acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. Cardiovascular drugs and therapy. 2006; 20 (3):167-175
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-006-8284-9
PMid:16775665
 
21. Babbitt DG, Virmani R, Forman MB. Intracoronary adenosine administered after reperfusion limits vascular injury after prolonged ischemia in the canine model. Circulation. 1989; 80 (5):1388-1399
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.80.5.1388
PMid:2805274
 
22. Grossi L, D'Angelo S. Sodium nitroprusside: mechanism of NO release mediated by sulfhydrylcontaining molecules. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2005; 48 (7):2622-2626
https://doi.org/10.1021/jm049857n
PMid:15801852
 
23. Salvemini D, Currie MG, Mollace V. Nitric oxide-mediated cyclooxygenase activation. A key event in the antiplatelet effects of nitrovasodilators. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1996; 97 (11):2562-2568
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118704
PMid:8647949 PMCid:PMC507342
 
24. Massoudy P, Zahler S, Barankay A, Becker BF, Richter JA, Meisner H. Sodium nitroprusside during coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence for an antiinflammatory action. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1999; 67 (4):1059-1064
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00157-5
PMid:10320251
 
25. Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, Baricos WH, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1981; 218 (3):739-749
 
26. Leone AM, Porto I, De Caterina AR, Basile E, Aurelio A, Gardi A, Russo D, Laezza D, Niccoli G, Burzotta F. Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012; 5 (4):402-408
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.014
PMid:22516396
 
27. Benz S, Schnabel R, Weber H, Pfeffer F, Wiesner R, von Breitenbuch P, Nizze H, Schareck W, Hopt UT. THE NITRIC OXIDE DONOR SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE IS PROTECTIVE IN ISCHEMIA/REPERFUSION INJURY OF THE PANCREAS1. Transplantation. 1998; 66 (8):994-999
https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199810270-00005
PMid:9808481
 
28. Berg R, Buhari C. Treating and preventing no reflow in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Current cardiology reviews. 2012; 8 (3):209-214
https://doi.org/10.2174/157340312803217148
PMid:22920488 PMCid:PMC3465826
 
29. Wang HJ, Lo PH, Lin JJ, Lee H, Hung JS. Treatment of slow/no‐ reflow phenomenon with intracoronary nitroprusside injection in primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. 2004; 63 (2):171-176
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20149
PMid:15390241
 
30. Kobatake R, Sato T, Fujiwara Y, Sunami H, Yoshioka R, Ikeda T, Saito H, Ujihira T. Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction. Heart and vessels. 2011; 26 (4):379-384
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-010-0065-5
PMid:21110199
 
31. Parham WA, Bouhasin A, Ciaramita JP, Khoukaz S, Herrmann SC, Kern MJ. Coronary hyperemic dose responses of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside. Circulation. 2004; 109 (10):1236-1243
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000118470.52908.D9
PMid:14993141
 
32. Parikh KH, Chag MC, Shah KJ, Shah UG, Baxi HA, Chandarana AH, Naik AM, Shah JN, Shah HD, Goyal RK. Intracoronary boluses of adenosine and sodium nitroprusside in combination reverses slow/no-reflow during angioplasty: a clinical scenario of ischemic preconditioning. Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology. 2007; 85 (3-4):476-482
https://doi.org/10.1139/Y07-013
PMid:17612657
 
33. Coller BS. Platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonists: the first anti-integrin receptor therapeutics. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1997; 99 (7):1467-1471
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119307
PMid:9119988 PMCid:PMC507964
 
34. Eeckhout E, Kern M. The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies. European heart journal. 2001; 22 (9):729-739
https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2000.2172
PMid:11350105
 
35. Qin T, Xie L, Chen M-H. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of intracoronary administration of tirofiban for no-reflow phenomenon. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2013; 13 (1):68 .
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-13-68
PMid:24016038 PMCid:PMC3847195
 
36. Mak K-H . Recovery of coronary flow and left ventricular function after abciximab. Circulation. 1999; 100 (22):e110-e110
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.22.e110
PMid:10578011
 
37. Sun B, Liu Z, Yin H, Wang T, Chen T, Yang S, Jiang Z. Intralesional versus intracoronary administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine 2017; 96 (40).
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008223
PMid:28984776 PMCid:PMC5738012
 
38. Chiariello M, Gold HK, Leinbach RC, Davis MA, Maroko PR. Comparison between the effects of nitroprusside and nitroglycerin on ischemic injury during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1976; 54 (5):766-773
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.54.5.766
PMid:824065
 
39. Sai S, Louie F, Sitaram S, Arunachalam V. Impact of intracoronary administration of nitroprusside vs. nitroglycerine before balloon dilatation on slow reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2011; 12 (3):e15-e16
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2011.04.284
 
40. Kaumann A, Lemoine H. β 2-Adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic effect of adrenaline in human ventricular myocardium. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology. 1987; 335 (4):403-411.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165555
PMid:2885760
 
41. Sato T, Sasaki N, O'Rourke B, Marbán E. Nicorandil, a potent cardioprotective agent, acts by opening mitochondrial ATP-dependent potassium channels. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000; 35 (2):514- 518
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00552-5
PMid:10676702
 
42. Cahoon NJ. Efficacy and mechanism of nicorandil in perioperative protection of skeletal muscle from ischaemia and reperfusion injury in a porcine model. University of Glasgow. 2012. In available: https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2979529
 
43. Ito H, Taniyama Y, Iwakura K, Nishikawa N, Masuyama T, Kuzuya T, Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T. Intravenous nicorandil can preserve microvascular integrity and myocardial viability in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999; 33 (3):654-660
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00604-4
PMid:10080465
 
44. Ishii H, Ichimiya S, Kanashiro M, Amano T, Imai K, Murohara T, Matsubara T. Impact of a Single Intravenous Administration of Nicorandil Before Reperfusion in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circulation.2005; 112 (9):1284-1288
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.530329
PMid:16116055
 
45. Lim SY, Bae EH, Jeong MH, Kang DG, Lee YS, Kim KH, Lee SH, Yoon KH, Hong SN, Park HW. Effect of combined intracoronary adenosine and nicorandil on no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation Journal. 2004; 68 (10):928-932
https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.68.928
PMid:15459466
 
46. Mizumura T, Nithipatikom K, Gross GJ. Infarct size-reducing effect of nicorandil is mediated by the KATP channel but not by its nitrate-like properties in dogs. Cardiovascular research. 1996; 32 (2):274-285 47. Tsubokawa A, Ueda K, Sakamoto H, Iwase T, Tamaki S-i. Effect of intracoronary nicorandil administration on preventing no-reflow/slow flow phenomenon during rotational atherectomy. Circulation journal. 2002; 66 (12):1119-1123
https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.66.1119
PMid:12499617
 
48. Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, Thibault H, Rioufol G, Mewton N, Elbelghiti R, Cung TT, Bonnefoy E, Angoulvant D. Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008; 359 (5):473-481
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa071142
PMid:18669426
 
49. Kucukcelebi A, Ozcan M. The beneficial effect of cyclosporin-A on the no-reflow phenomenon in rat skin island flaps. British journal of plastic surgery. 1992; 45 (7):512-514
https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90144-M
PMid:1446193
 
50. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Gansser D, Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 22007; 64 (3):292-303
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02899.x
PMid:17506785 PMCid:PMC2000643
 
51. Spagnoli V, Klein E, Sideris G, Magkoutis N, Brumpt C, Bal Dit Sollier C, Henry P, Drouet L. Correlation between burst of thrombin and microvacular obstruction (no reflow) during ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary Intervention. European Heart Journal. 2013; 34 (suppl_1):1608
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht308.1608
 
52. Hale SL, Kloner RA. Dabigatran treatment: effects on infarct size and the no-reflow phenomenon in a model of acute myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis. 2015; 39 (1):50-54
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-014-1098-x
PMid:25017632
 
53. Nauck MA, Meier JJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 and its derivatives in the treatment of diabetes. Regulatory peptides. 2005; 128 (2):135-148
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2004.07.014
PMid:15780433
 
54. Chen WR, Tian F, Dai Chen Y, Wang J, Yang JJ, Wang ZF, Da Wang J, Ning QX. Effects of liraglutide on no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. International journal of cardiology. 2016; 208:109-114
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.009
PMid:26849684
 
55. Poupko JM, Baskin SI, Moore E. The pharmacological properties of anisodamine. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 2007; 27 (2):116-121
https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.1154
PMid:17186568
 
56. Niu X, Zhang J, Bai M, Peng Y, Sun S, Zhang Z. Effect of intracoronary agents on the no-reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2018; 18 (1):3
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0722-z
PMid:29320987 PMCid:PMC5763527
 
57. Jun W, FAN G, Yunfa WJ. Effect of intracoronary administration of anisodamine on slow reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction [J]. Journal of Clinical Cardiology. 2006; 1:008
 
58. Poeggeler B, Saarela S, Reiter RJ, TAN DX, CHEN LD, Manchester LC, BARLOW‐ WALDEN LR. Melatonin-a highly potent endogenous radical scavenger and electron donor: new aspects of the oxidation chemistry of this indole accessed in vitro. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1994; 738 (1):419-420
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb21831.x
PMid:7832450
 
59. Zhou H, Ma Q, Zhu P, Ren J, Reiter RJ, Chen Y . Protective role of melatonin in cardiac ischemia‐ reperfusion injury: from pathogenesis to targeted therapy. Journal of pineal research. 2018; 64(3).
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12471
PMid:29363153
 
60. Reiter RJ, Tan D-X. Melatonin: a novel protective agent against oxidative injury of the ischemic/reperfused heart. Cardiovascular research. 2003; 58 (1):10-19
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00827-1
PMid:12667942
 
61. Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial- Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2003; 361 (9364):1149- 1158
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12948-0
PMid:12686036
 
62. Liu W, Zou Z, Jiang H, Li Q, Guo F, Wang Z, Zhu H. Clinical effect of preoperative high-dose atorvastatin against no-reflow after PCI. Experimental and therapeutic medicine. 2017; 13 (1):97-102
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3910
PMid:28123475 PMCid:PMC5244837
 
63. BriguoriC C, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Golia B, Chieffo A, Casteli A, et al. Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events (Naples) II trial: impact of a single high loading dose of atorvastatin on periprocedural myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;54(23):2157-63.
 
64. Eshraghi A, Talasaz AH, Salamzadeh J, Salarifar M, Pourhosseini H, Nozari Y, Bahremand M, Jalali A, Boroumand MA . Evaluating the effect of intracoronary N-acetylcysteine on platelet activation markers after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. American journal of therapeutics. 2016; 23 (1):e44-e51
https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000309
PMid:26291594
 
65. Andrews NP, Prasad A, Quyyumi AA. N-acetylcysteine improves coronary and peripheral vascular function. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001; 37 (1):117-123
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01093-7
PMid:11153725
 
66. Weinbroum AA, Kluger Y, Abraham RB, Shapira I, Karchevski E, Rudick V. LUNG PRECONDITIONING WITH N-ACETYL-l-CYSTEINE PREVENTS REPERFUSION INJURY AFTER LIVER NO FLOW-REFLOW: A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY1. Transplantation 2001; 71 (2):300-306
https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200101270-00023
PMid:11213077