Morphometric Characteristics of 1200 Normal Kidneys in Cadavers at the Mashhad Forensic Medicine Center

Authors

1 Mashhad Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Public Health, School of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Neurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran

5 Tel: +98 513 8425946 Email: Arya_hegazi@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Kidneys play an important role in excertion of bodily waste and the regulation of water and electrolyte. Currently available sources and books are based on anthropometric characteristics from Western countries. Determining national anthropometric measurements is a research priority in Iran. Based on a recent search, no study has been done on the standard data of kidneys in the Iranian population. Objectives: The present study investigated the morphometrical characteristics of the kidney (length, width, thickness, index, and weight) in an Iranian population. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 604 cadavers (122 females/482 males) with a mean age of 43.86 ± 19.09 years in Mashhad Forensic Medicine Center in 2015. After approval of the Ethical Committee, demographic characterizes of cadavers were recorded. Then, length, width, thickness, index and weight of kidney were measured using a vernier caliber. At the end, data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Themean length of the kidney was 11.12 ± 1.73 cm, mean width was 5.09 ± 2.19 cm, mean thickness was 2.60 ± 1.39 cm, kidney index was 2.33 ± 1.62, and mean weight was 143.03 ± 52.97 g. No significant difference was seen in the morphometric values of the kidney between males and females (P>0.05), but a significant correlation was found between the age and body surface area of the cadavers and the length, width, thickness, index, and weight of the studied kidneys (P

Keywords

References

1.Dark RL, Vogle AW, Mithell AW. Gray’s anatomy, in alimentary system. 3rd ed.London: Churchill Livingstone; 2015.P.1815.
2. Bridger R. Introduction to ergonomics. Abingdon:Taylor & Francis;2003. P. 58-87.
3. Prakash C, Deopa D, Thakkar HK. Study of internal organ weight and its correlation to body weight in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2013;35(1):29-32.
4. Narongchai P, Narongchai S. Study of the normal internal organ weights in Thai population. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;
91(5):747-53. [PubMed:18672642].
5. KimYS, Kim DI, Cho SY, Kim MH, Yang KM, Lee HY, et al. Statistical analysis for organ weightsinKorean adult autopsies.
Korean J Anat. 2009;42(4):219-24.
6. de la Grandmaison GL, Clairand I, Durigon M. Organ weight in 684adult autopsies: new tables for a Caucasoid population. Forensic SciInt. 2001;119(2):149-54.[PubMed:11376980].
7. Ogiu N, Nakamura Y, Ijiri I, Hiraiwa K, Ogiu T. A statistical analysisof the internal organ weights of normal Japanese
people. Health Phys. 1997;72(3):368-83.[PubMed:9030838].
8. SeoJS, Lee SY, Won KJ, Kim DJ, Sohn DS, Yang KM, et al. Relationship between normal heart size and body indices in
Korean. J Korean Med Sci. 2000;15(6):641-6. doi:10.3346/ jkms.2000.15.6.641. [PubMed:11194190].
9. TannaJA, Patel PN, Kalele SD. Relation between organ weights and body weight in adult population of Bhavnagar region-a post-mortem study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2011;3(1):57-9.
10. Mathuramon P, Chirachariyavej T, Peonim AV, Rochanawutanon M. Correlation of internal organ weight with body weight and length in normal Thai adults. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;
92(20:250-8. [PubMed:19253802].
11. Mannan S, Khalil M, Rahman M, Ahmed MS. Measurement of different external dimensions of the heart in adult
Bangladeshi cadaver. Mymensingh Med J. 2009;18(2):175-8. [PubMed:19623143].
12. Cheong B, Muthupillai R, Rubin MF, Flamm SD.Normal values for renal length and volume as measured by magnetic
resonance imaging.Clin J Am SocNephrol. 2007;2(1):38-45. doi:0.2215/CJN.00930306. [PubMed:17699385].
13. Glodny B, Unterholzner V, Taferner B, Hofmann KJ, Rehder P, Strasak A, et al.Normal kidney size and its influencing factors - a 64-slice MDCT study of 1.040 asymptomatic patients. BMC Urol. 2009;9:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-9-19. [PubMed:
0030823].
14. SampaioFJ, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA.Morphometry of the kidney. Applied study in urology and imaging. J Urol (Paris).1989;95(2):77-80.[PubMed:2659677].
15. Maaji SM, Daniel O, Adamu B. Sonographic measurement of renal dimensions of adults in northwestern Nigeria: a
preliminary report. SubSaharan Afr J Med. 2015;2(3):123-7.doi:10.4103/2384-5147.164420.
16. Kang KY, Lee YJ, Park SC, Yang CW, Kim Y, Moon IS, et al. A comparative study of methods of estimating kidney length in kidney transplantation donors.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(8):2322-7. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm192. [PubMed:17452412].
17. BuchholzNP, Abbas F, Biyabani SR, Afzal M, Javed Q, Rizvi I, et al. Ultrasonographicrenal size in individuals without
known renal disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 2000;50(1):12-6. [PubMed:10770041].
18. Muthusami P, Ananthakrishnan R, Santosh P.Need for a nomogram of renal sizes in the Indian population- findings
from a single centresonographic study. Indian J Med Res. 2014;139(5):686-93.[PubMed:25027077].
19. Abdulla AA. Ultrasonographicmeasurments of kidney dimensions of 109 Filipinos in South Luzon-A descriptive
study. Acta Med Philippina. 2010;44(3):35-8.
20. Adulto PM, AnatómicoUE. Morphometric parameters of the human adult kidney: an anatomical study. Int JMorphol.
2014;32(2):656-9.
21. Hasini BC. A post mortem study of age related changes in kidneys. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2016;2(1):163-5.
22. Vasconcelos VT, Katayama RC, Ribeiro MF, Medina-Pestana JO, Baptista-Silva JC. Kidney weight and volume among living donors in Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J. 2007;125(4):223-5. [PubMed:17992393].
23. Molina DK, DiMaioVJ. Normal organ weights in men: part II-the brain, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2012;33(4):368-72. doi:10.1097/PAF.0b013e31823d29ad.
[PubMed:22182984].
24. Molina DK, DiMaioVJ. Normal organ weights in women: part II-the brain, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2015;36(3):182-7. doi:10.1097/PAF.0000000000000175.
[PubMed:26108038].
25. CaglarV, Kumral B, Uygur R, Alkoc OA, Ozen OA, Demirel H. Study of volume, weight and size of normal pancreas, spleen and kidney in adults autopsies. Forensic MedAnat Res. 2014;2(3):63-9.doi:10.4236/fmar.2014.23012.
26. Singh D, Bansal YS, Sreenivas M, Pandey AN, Tyagi S. Weights of human organs at autopsy in Chandigarh zone of north-west India. JIAFM.2004;26(3):97-9.
27. Chirachariyavej T, Ouyswat K, Sanggarnjanavanich S, Tiensuwan M, Peonim V, Sirikulchayanonta V. Normal internal
organ weight of Thai adults correlated to body length and body weight.J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(10):1702-12. [PubMed: 17128847].
28. Moore KL, Dally AF, Agur Am. Clinically oriented anatomy. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. P. 311.
29. Otiv A, Mehta K, Ali U, Nadkarni M.Sonographic measurement of renal size in normal Indian children.Indian Pediatr.
2012;49(7):533-6. [PubMed:22317981].
30. CrelinES. Kidneys. In: CrelinES, editor. Functional anatomy of the newborn. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1973. P. 62-4.
31. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Lim SH, Kim J, Lee MJ. Length and volume of morphologically normal kidneys in Korean children:
ultrasound measurement and estimation using body size. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(4):677-82. doi:0.3348/kjr.2013.14.4.677. [PubMed:23901327].
Razavi International Journal of Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 4
October 2018
Pages 23-27

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics