Hijacking By Email: A New FraudMethod

Authors

1 Faculty of Medicine,Mashhad University of Medical Sciences,Mashhad, IR Iran

2 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IranTel: +989155084676; Email: dadgarmm@mums.ac.ir

10.17795/rijm37366

Abstract

Abstract Research misconduct is not a new problem in the research field. However, in recent years, the researchers themselves could be a victimof a newly expanded trouble: being hijacked by email. Being obsessive about publishing one’s research results and finding the “real journals” seems not to be enough in recent years. In this article we will have a closer look to this issue and discuss two real examples happened to us. At the end, there are a few tips which could be helpful in encountering with such issues. We hope that dessiminating such data could raise the public and academic awareness and finally eliminate the expansion of this fraudmethod.

Keywords


  1. 1.Khadem-Rezayian M, Dadgar Moghadam M. Which Metric Is More Appropriate to Evaluate Researchers?. Asia Pac J Med Toxicol. 2015;4:94.

    1. Merriam Webster Online Dictionary 2016. [cited 20 February 2016]. Available from: http://www.merriam-webster.com.
    2. Dadkhah M, Quliyeva A. Social engineering in academic world. J Contemp Appl Math. 2015;4(2):3–5.
    3. Jalalian M, Mahboobi H. Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Is There a Need to Re-Think How to Assess the Quality of Academic Research?. Walailak J Sci Tech. 2014;11(5):389–94.
    4. Dadkhah M, Davarpanah Jazi M, Pacukaj S. Fake Conferences for Earning Real Money. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2015;6(2):11–2. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p11.