Study of Personality Type and Relationship With Job Selection Between Iranian and American Students


1 Department of Counseling, Islamic Azad University of Quchan, Quchan, IR Iran

2 Department of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mshhad, IR Iran


Background: Today, continuous emergence of new jobs and elimination of old jobs have made a lot of problems for some individuals and in the meantime, developing countries transferring from traditional economy to world economy are more influenced by these changes. Objectives: Considering the importance of personality types and the role of culture in job selection, the current study was conducted aimed to examine personality types in students of Iran and America. Patients and Methods: The study method was correlation. The statistical population consisted of all students at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran and all the students at El-Camino College, America in the academic year 2012-2013. The participants were selected using convenience sampling method. Using Cochran’s sample size formula, 320 students (170 Iranian students and 150 American students) were selected from two universities and questionnaires were distributed among them. Data collection tools included Holland’s vocational personality questionnaire in six personality types of social, artistic, conventional, realistic, enterprising, and investigative that its validity and reliability have been confirmed in different countries. The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive statistical indices, Z-test and Chi-squared test. Results: The findings of the study showed that: 1) There was a significant relationship between Iranian students' personality type and their job 2) There was compatibility between American students' personality type and their job 3) There was not a significant difference between correlation rate of personality type and job in two groups of Iranian and American students. Conclusions: Considering the obtained results, job selection by students in both Iranian and American groups was not independent from their personality type.


  1. 1.Aralmani G, Aralmani SN. Career consulting.New Dehli: Tata, McGraw - Hill Companies; 2004.

    1. Hoseinian S, editor. The necessity of students’ educational guidance in selecting art and student selection.; Article Collection of the Conference on the Methods of Teaching Art.; 1999; Tehran. Alzahra University;
    2. Guichard J. Career Counseling for Human Development: An International Perspective. Career Develop Q. 2003;51(4):306–21.
    3. Honkaniemi L, Feldt T, Metsäpelto RL, Tolvanen A. Personality Types and Applicant Reactions in Real-life Selection. Int J Select Assess. 2013;21(1):32–45.
    4. Rezaei A, Qorbanpoor A, AhmadiGatab T, Rezaei A. Comparative Research for Personality Types of Guilan University Physical Exercise and Counseling Students Based on Holland Theory. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;30:2032–6.
    5. Long NR, Gordon-Crosby J. Variables important in the selection of New Zealand nurses: implementation and evaluation of a multivariate selection technique. Int J Nurs Stud. 1981;18(4):227– 35.
    6. Montazergheib T, Keikhanejad M. The relationship between the components of job burnout and John olland’s personality types among teachers and principals of elementary schools. Q Career Organis Consult. 2012;10(4):92-104.
    7. Bahonar A, Chalabi P, Mostafavi A, Yazdi M. Compatibility of veterinary students' personality type with their educational discipline. Iran J Educ Med Sci. 2011;11(3):222–9.
    8. Eswaran S, Islam MA, Yusuf DHM. A study of the relationship between the big five personality dimensions and job involvement in a foreign based financial institution in Penang. Int Bus Res. 2011;4(4):p164.
    9. Holland JL. Which profession Suits You?Tehran: Kamal Tarbiat Publishers; 2011.
    10. Lent RW, Brown SD. Career development and consulting.: John Weily & Sons; 2008.
    11. Deng CP, Armstrong PI, Rounds J. The fit of Holland’s RIASEC model to US occupations. J Vocat Behav. 2007;71(1):1–22.
    12. Farr JM, Ludden LV. O* NET Dictionary of Occupational Titles.: Jist Works; 2001.
    13. Brown SD, Lent RW. Career development and consulting: putting theory and research to work.: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
    14. Betz NE, Borgen FH, Rottinghaus P, Paulsen A, Halper CR, Harmon LW. The Expanded Skills Confidence Inventory: Measuring basic dimensions of vocational activity. J Vocat Behav. 2003;62(1):76–100.
    15. Abdi B. Awareness of the University Candidates on the Academic Program Selection. J Res Plan High Educ. 2007;44:131–50.
    16. Mirsepasi N. Compatibility between personality type and job, a plan which managers have paid the least attention to. Manage Knowledge. 1999;44:1–24.
    17. Weininger EB, Lareau A. Cultural Capita; In Encyclopedia of Sociology. Ritzer G editor. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2007.
    18. Mohammadi A, editor. Contemplating on engineering of culture.; Article Collection of the First National Engineering-Cultural Conference.; 2008; Tehran. The Secretariat of the High Council of Cultural Revolution;
    19. Bourdieu P, Passeron JC, de Saint Martin M. Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power.Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1996.
    20. Alavi Moghaddam RS. Career and personality. Lit Art Magaz. 1994;56.
    21. Hoseinian S, Yazdi S, editors. Applicability of Holland’s vocational decision making theory in schools, universities and the job market in Iran.; The First Conference on the Role of Career Consulting and Guidance in the Job Market.; 2004; Iran;
    22. Farah Shirazi N, editor. Examining the relationship between personality type and job satisfaction of high school teachers of experimental sciences and literature in Boushehr.; 1998; Boushehr.
    23. Shafi' Abaad A. Guidance and Vocational and Professional Advice. 16 ed edTehran: Roshd Publication; 2011.
    24. Memarzadeh G, Mehrnia A. Examining the necessity of compatibility between personality and most of high risk operational occupations"correct employment and increasing efficiency". Manage Stud Iran. 2010;14(3):227–49.
    25. Sadeghian M, Jalali S. Comparative examination of personality traits of pilots, physicians and teachers. It J Educ Vocat Guid. 2010;8(2):111–25.
    26. Zunker V. Career Consulting Applied Concepts of Life Planning.California: Cole Publishing Company; 1994.
    27. Zhang D, Shao J. Group training on the improvement of 'women college students' career decision-making self-efficacy. China Ment Health J. 2010;20(11):765–7.
    28. Grier-Reed TL, Skaar NR. An Outcome Study of Career Decision Self-Efficacy and Indecision in an Undergraduate Constructivist Career Course. Career Develop Q. 2010;59(1):42–53.
    29. Gushue GV, Scanlan KRL, Pantzer KM, Clarke CP. The relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. J Career Develop. 2006;33(1):19–28.
    30. Lee KH. Coping with Career Indecision: Differences between Four Career Choice Types. J Career Develop. 2005;31(4):279–89.
    31. Sidiropoulou-Dimakakou D, Mylonas K, Argyropoulou K. Holland’s hexagonal personality model for a sample of Greek uni- Rafaee Saeedi N et al. Razavi Int J Med. 2014;2(3):e21173 7 versity students. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance. 2008;8(2):111–25.
    32. Lim HE, Lee MS, Ko YH, Park YM, Joe SH, Kim YK, et al. Assessment of the type D personality construct in the Korean population: a validation study of the Korean DS14. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26(1):116–23.
    33. Chung YB. Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy and Career Commitment: Gender and Ethnic Differences Among College Students. J Career Develop. 2002;28(4):277–84.
    34. Amundson NE, Harris-Niles J, Niles SG. Essential elements of career consulting: Processes and techniques.: Amazon, Inc; 2009.
    35. Aysan F, Totan T. Constructivist career counseling and its applicability in Turkey. Procedia Soci Behav Sci. 2009;1(1):2147–50.