Prediction of the Likelihood of Marriage and Non-marriage in Divorced Women Based on Personality Traits and Psychological Well-being [Revision Publish ]

Authors

Abstract

Marriage is one of the important protective factors of persons’ subjective well-being. For most people, their relationship with the spouse or the partner is the most important interpersonal relationships throughout their lives. Objectives: The aim of present study was a prediction of the likelihood of marriage and non-marriage in divorced women based on personality traits and psychological well-being. Methods: The method of this research was descriptive and correlational and statistical society consisted of all divorced women who are a member of supporting the association of divorced women in Region 2 of Tehran in the winter and spring of 2015 and 2016. 200 persons were chosen by purposive and available sampling. For data collection, the participants responded to the Reef’s psychological well-being questionnaires and NEO-Five Factor Inventory. Logistic regression was used to analyze the data. Results: The results showed that among the psychological well-being dimensions, the environmental dominance dimension predicts the likelihood of remarriage positively (p <0.01) and autonomy dimension negatively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Among personality factors, agreeableness and openness to experience dimensions predict the likelihood of remarriage positively (p <0.05) and neuroticism negatively (p <0.05).

Keywords


1.Cleak H, Schofield M, Bickerdike A. Efficacy of family mediation & the role of family violence: study protocol. BMC Public Health.2014; 14: 57. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-57
2. Whisman MA, Baucom DH. Intimate Relationships & Psychopathology. Clinical Child and Family. Psychology Review.
2012; 15: 4-13.doi:10.1007/s10567-011-0107-2
3. Haimi M, Lerner A. The Impact of Parental Separation and Divorce on the Health Status of Children, and the Ways to
Improve it. J Clin Med Genomics.2016; 4:137. doi:10.4172/2472-128X.1000137.
4 .Ryff CD. Happiness Is Everything, Or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-being. J Personality and Social Psychology.1989;57(6): 1069-1081.doi:10.1037/0022-
3514.57.6.1069
5. Lorenz FO, Wickrama KA, Conger RD, Elder GH. The short-term and decade-long effects of divorce on women's midlife health.J Health and social Behavior. 2006;47(2):111-25.doi:10.1177/002214650604700202
6. Abolghasemi A, Kiamarsia A. Early maladaptive schema in women with sexual dysfunctions and normal women. Middle- East J of Scientific Research. 2012; 9(12): 1245-1249. doi:10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.9.365
7. Briley DA, Tucker-Drob EM. Genetic and Environmental Continuity in Personality Development: A Meta- Analysis.
Psychological bulletin. 2014;140(5):1303-1331.doi:10.1037/a0037091.
8. Dastjerdi R, ValiAllah F, Kadivar P. The five personality factors in predicting psychological well-being. Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011; 18(2): 126-133.
9. Brock RL, Lawrence E. Marital Processes, Neuroticism, and Stress as Risk Factors for Internalizing Symptoms. Couple & family psychology. 2014;3(1):30-47. doi:10.1037/cfp0000007.
10 .Lamont AE, Vermunt JK, Van Horn ML. Regression mixture models: Does modeling the covariance between independent variables and latent classes improve the results? Multivariate
behavioral research. 2016;51(1):35-52. doi:10.1080/00273171.2015.1095063.
11. Ryff CD. Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development.1989; 12(1): 35-55 doi:10.1177/016502548901200102
12. Biabani AA, Kochaki AM, Biabani A. Reliability and validity of Ryff's psychological well-being scale. J Psychiatric and clinical Psychol. 2008; 14(2):146-151.
13. Gooding DC, Padrutt ER, Pflum MJ. The Predictive Value of the NEO-FFI Items: Parsing the Nature of Social Anhedonia Using the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale and the ACIPS. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:147. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00147.
14. Chapman BP. Bandwidth and Fidelity on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Replicability and Reliability of Saucier’s (1998)
Item Cluster Subcomponents. Journal of personality assessment.2007;88(2):10.1080/00223890701268082.
doi:10.1080/00223890701268082.
15. Ahadi B. The relationship between personality traits and mental health. J Educational Sciences.2007; 1 (2), 18-7.
16. Lavelle B, Smock PJ. DIVORCE AND WOMEN’S RISK OF HEALTH INSURANCE LOSS. Journal of health and social
behavior. 2012;53(4):413-431. doi:10.1177/0022146512465758.
17. Brown SL, Lin I-F. The Gray Divorce Revolution: Rising Divorce Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults, 1990–2010. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2012;67(6):731-741.
doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs089.
18. Ge Y, Se J, Zhang J. Research on Relationship among InternetAddiction, Personality Traits and Mental Health of Urban LeftBehind Children. Global Journal of Health Science. 2015;7(4):60-69. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p60.
19. Ryff CD. Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in Science and Practice. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.
2014;83(1):10-28. doi:10.1159/000353263.
20. Curhan KB, Levine CS, Markus HR, et al. Subjective and Objective Hierarchies and Their Relations to Psychological WellBeing: A U.S/Japan Comparison. Social psychological and personality science. 2014;5(8):855-864.
doi:10.1177/1948550614538461.
21 .Karasawa M, Curhan KB, Markus HR, et al. Cultural Perspectives on Aging and Well-Being: A Comparison of Japan and the U.S. International journal of aging & human development.
2011;73(1):73-98.
22. Haffarian L, Aqaie A, Kajbaf, MB., Kamkar M. Comparing the quality of life of divorced women and Ghyrmtlqh and its
relationship with demographic characteristics in Shiraz. Journal of Research in Applied Psychology, Islamic Azad University Khorasgan.2010; 41: 82-61.
23 .JafarNodoushan A, Zare H, HosseiniHnzaie A, Pour SalehiNavideh M, Zini M. Review and compare mental health and
cognitive emotion regulation compliance and divorced women, married women in Yazd city. Jwomen and society.2015; 6 (2): 16-2.
24. Blatný M, Millová K, Jelínek M, Osecká T. Personality Predictors of Successful Development: Toddler Temperament and Adolescent Personality Traits Predict Well-Being and Career Stability in Middle Adulthood. Latzman RD, ed. PLoS ONE.
2015;10(4):e0126032. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126032.
25. Zhou Y, Wang K, Chen S, Zhang J, Zhou M. An Exploratory Investigation of the Role of Openness in Relationship Quality among Emerging Adult Chinese Couples. Frontiers in Psychology.
2017;8:382. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00382.
26. Turiano NA, Spiro A, Mroczek DK. Openness to Experience and Mortality in Men: Analysis of Trait and Facets. Journal of aging and health. 2012;24(4):654-672. doi:10.1177/0898264311431303.